The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (known as ASEAN) celebrated its 50-year anniversary in early August. The regional cooperative was established in 1967 with Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Singapore as founding members. Brunei Darussalam, Vietnam, Lao PDR, Myanmar and Cambodia later joined.
八月初，东南亚国家联盟（Association of Southeast Asian Nations），简称东盟（ASEAN）,举行东盟成立五十周年庆典。该区域合作组织成立于1967年，创始国包括泰国、印度尼西亚、马来西亚、菲律宾和新加坡。文莱、越南、老挝、缅甸和柬埔寨先后加入该组织。
Back in 1967, the region was filled with strife, and the association was established to help bring peace, stability and prosperity. ASEAN's broad aim and purpose is stated as: “To accelerate the economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region through joint endeavours in the spirit of equality and partnership in order to strengthen the foundation for a prosperous and peaceful community.”1
- Mutual respect for the independence, sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity and national identity of all nations;
- The right of every State to lead its national existence free from external interference, subversion or coercion;
- Non-interference in the internal affairs of one another;
- Settlement of differences or disputes by peaceful manner;
- Renunciation of the threat or use of force; and
- Effective cooperation among themselves.
The spirit of peaceful cooperation has been dubbed the “ASEAN Way” and has been accompanied by impressive growth over the past 50 years. ASEAN today represents the world's seventh-largest market with the third-largest labor force (behind China and India), and there are projections it will become the fourth-largest economic bloc by 2030.3
Since its founding, there has been a great deal more cooperation between countries in ASEAN and more travel interchange, even among countries which historically had been enemies. When I was recently in Myanmar, I met with executives of a Thai oil company drilling for oil and gas offshore there. They said cooperation from the Myanmar authorities had been very good and they expected positive results from their operations in the country.
Given all the challenges, I would give ASEAN an “A” grade for its efforts and the gradual introduction of various cooperation measures. Its members have been successful in cooperating to improve regional trade and investment, and also in tourism. Now, I think the next step is to move toward a common currency and common banking system.
Gross domestic product (GDP) growth among its members also has achieved high marks, with 2019's growth projections for several of its members seen outpacing that of China.4
A Diverse Group
While ASEAN represents a block of smaller countries banding together to create a more powerful global voice, these countries are quite different. When ASEAN was formed, its members largely held similar political systems, but today there are a variety of ideologies, from communism to democracy to monarchy.
The wealth and development of its members also varies, with per-capita GDP in Singapore and Brunei putting them in a much higher category of wealth than other ASEAN members. There are even some observers who have made the case for Singapore to be considered a developed, as opposed to an emerging, market.
When it comes to competitiveness, the World Economic Forum's 2018-2019 Global Competitiveness Report puts Singapore at the top of the ASEAN pack—the country actually ranks number two globally.5 Malaysia ranked 25, while other ASEAN members were further down the ranks.
In the past five decades, ASEAN countries have made great economic strides, outpacing much of the world at large in terms of growth rates, albeit from a low base. In some cases, this progress has been quite dramatic. For example, since 1960, Singapore's per-capita GDP grew from US$428 to US$52,961, while Malaysia's per-capita GDP grew from US$235 to US$9,507.
As investors, the diversity of the region is particularly exciting with a number of potential opportunities in almost every endeavor of activity, from mining to consumer goods to technology. As trade and investment barriers come down, the ASEAN group will represent a huge market.
Rising growth rates have also created greater prosperity for the people at large, and since ASEAN was formed we've seen a new generation of consumers emerge. These countries by and large also boast youthful populations in their most productive years, which we think bodes well for their future.
Consumers are increasingly moving online, even in the newest and smallest markets. For example, since 2014, Myanmar has seen the number of Internet users rise from some 2 million to more than 39 million.6 The use of Smartphones has skyrocketed to pass the 80% penetration rate, according to reports from its three major telecommunications companies. That percentage is even higher than that of the United States!
Myanmar represents an example of the type of technology “leapfrogging” we see taking place in many emerging markets, whereas people are moving straight to mobile phones, bypassing landlines altogether.
Challenges and Opportunities
The biggest general risk to markets in the region we see emanates from a possible “black-swan” event, a market shock that cannot be predicted. China is of course a very important market in Asia, and any slowdown or derailment of its structural adjustment process could have short-term implications for investor sentiment toward ASEAN countries. On an even broader level, the world is still unbalanced—many countries have high debt levels.
据我们观察，该地区国家所面临的最大风险来源于潜在的“黑天鹅”事件，即不可预测的市场冲击。中国是亚洲非常重要的一大市场，在其结构调整过程中出现的任何放缓或错误在短期内都可能影响投资者对东盟国家的情绪。从更广泛的层面看，整个世界仍处于不均衡的局面 – 许多国家债务水平很高。
Some say the “ASEAN Way” has also been a hindrance in many aspects—bogged down with more meetings and discussion than actual action. The region hasn't achieved the type of economic integration—or clout—that the European Union (EU) has. Certainly ASEAN is much further away from the degree of integration that the EU has achieved.
ASEAN economies are just too diverse culturally, economically and politically to rise to be a stronger, unified force, some critics say. In our view, the move toward a common currency and common banking system represents the next step for ASEAN, but we must remember that the concept of a unified Europe goes further back in history. Louis IV bought a large part of Europe under his control. The royal families of Europe intermarried and provided a future base for more cooperation. We don't have a similar history in Asia (except for colonial powers, which had some integrating influence).
Perhaps Japan's plan for a “Greater Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere” was a step toward integration, but Japanese military aggression stimulated opposition rather than cooperation. A disadvantageous history does not mean that ASEAN can't become more integrated; there are a number of actions which have moved its members in the right direction. One challenge is China's opposition to a strong ASEAN.
Nonetheless, there has been a clear trend. For many years, the world's engine of economic growth hasn't been in developed markets, it's been in emerging markets. And Southeast Asia is helping provide the power.
I think ASEAN can continue to see progress as these economies continue to grow, and we welcome the opportunity to unlock investment opportunities there. There are so many common areas of cooperation between the countries, there is no doubt to us that ASEAN will continue to develop and progress over the long term.
Mark Mobius's comments, opinions and analyses are for informational purposes only and should not be considered individual investment advice or recommendations to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Because market and economic conditions are subject to rapid change, comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of the date of the posting and may change without notice. The material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment or strategy.
Important Legal Information
This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. The companies and case studies shown herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton Investments.
The opinions are intended solely to provide insight into how securities are analyzed. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio. This is not a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any industry, security or investment and should not be viewed as an investment recommendation. This is intended to provide insight into the portfolio selection and research process. Factual statements are taken from sources considered reliable but have not been independently verified for completeness or accuracy. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or as an offer for any particular security. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market.
Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user. Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own professional adviser or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Copyright ©  。富兰克林邓普顿投资。版权所有。
What Are the Risks?
All investments involve risks, including the possible loss of principal. Investments in foreign securities involve special risks including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments. Investments in emerging markets, of which frontier markets are a subset, involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets' smaller size, lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets. Because these frameworks are typically even less developed in frontier markets, as well as various factors including the increased potential for extreme price volatility, illiquidity, trade barriers and exchange controls, the risks associated with emerging markets are magnified in frontier markets. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions.
To get insights from Franklin Templeton delivered to your inbox, subscribe to the Investment Adventures in Emerging Markets blog.
有意从富兰克林邓普顿(Franklin Templeton)的邮件中了解更多信息，请订阅“新兴市场的投资冒险”(Investment Adventures in Emerging Markets)博客。
The technology industry can be significantly affected by obsolescence of existing technology, short product cycles, falling prices and profits, competition from new market entrants as well as general economic conditions. The technology sector has historically been volatile due to the rapid pace of product change and development within the sector.
4. Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Database, April 2019. China's 2019 GDP growth estimated at 6.7%. There is no assurance any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.
5. Source: World Economic Forum, Global CompetitivenessReport, 2018–2019.
6. Source: Myanmar Times, “Ministry Puts Mobile Penetration at 90 Percent,” July 2019.