Cultivating Emotion Regulation and Mental Health
2019-10-09 14:35

The ability to regulate our emotions is essential to reaching our goals and feeling mentally healthy. Since this is such an important topic, I was delighted to get a chance to interview Dr. Susanne Schweizer, a Sir Henry Wellcome fellow at the UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience. Dr. Schweizer studies the role of cognitive processes (e.g., emotion regulation) and their neural substrates in the development and maintenance of common mental health problems across the lifespan, with a particular focus on adolescence. Adopting a translational perspective, Dr. Schweizer applies insights from basic developmental cognitive neuroscience to design novel interventions for mental health problems including depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. Before moving to UCL she completed her PhD as a Gates Scholar and later postdoc at the University of Cambridge.

调节情绪的能力对于达成目标和保持心理健康至关重要。由于这是一个如此重要的话题,我很高兴有机会采访苏珊娜·施韦泽(Susanne Schweizer)教授,她是是伦敦大学学院认知神经科学研究所的亨利·韦尔科姆先生的同事。施韦泽博士研究认知过程(如情绪调节)及其神经基质在人类,尤其是青少年一生中常见心理健康问题的发展和维持中的作用。施魏策尔采用了一种转译的视角,运用基础发展认知神经科学的观点,设计了针对抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍等心理健康问题的新干预措施。在搬到伦敦大学学院之前,她修完了盖茨学者博士学位课程,之后在剑桥大学获得博士后学位。

How did you become interested in emotion regulation?


My interest was sparked a decade ago. I spent a summer working with the late Professor Nolen-Hoeksema in the Department of Psychology at Yale University. Part of my job was to read about emotion regulation. What I was struck by then was the pervasiveness of emotion regulation difficulties across different types of mental health problems from depression to eating disorders. This sense was brought home the following spring, which I spent completing my clinical internship on an acute closed psychiatric ward. It didn’t seem to matter what the disorder was – every form of psychopathology appeared to be accompanied by a breakdown in the ability to regulate emotions and mood. This was fascinating to me and I needed to understand what was causing these problems in emotion regulation. So I went to do a PhD with one of the world’s foremost experts on mood and emotions in mental health, Professor Tim Dalgleish at the University of Cambridge’s MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.

我的兴趣是十年前开始的。我和已故的耶鲁大学(Yale University)心理学系教授诺伦-霍克西玛(Nolen-Hoeksema)一整个夏天都在一起工作。我的部分工作是阅读有关情绪调节的书籍。当时让我震惊的是,从抑郁症到饮食失调,不同类型的心理健康问题都普遍存在情绪调节困难。这种感觉在回国后还是存在,第二年春天我在一个紧急关闭的精神病病房完成了我的临床实习。这似乎与疾病无关——每种形式的精神病理似乎都伴随着情绪和情绪调节能力的崩溃。这对我来说很具吸引力,我需要了解是什么导致了情绪调节方面的问题。因此,我和剑桥大学医学研究理事会认知和脑科学部门的Tim Dalgleish教授一起读了博士。

What can the brain tell you about emotion regulation?


Just a couple of years before I started my PhD, James Gross at Stanford and Kevin Ochsner at NYU developed their influential neuroscientific account of emotion regulation. Their model proposed that successful emotion regulation relies on cognitive control. Cognitive control refers to our ability to attend to information that is relevant to our goals, while ignoring distracting information. Their reason for suggesting this was accumulating evidence from brain imaging studies, which showed that the brain regions that are recruited during cognitive control overlapped with the brain regions involved in emotion regulation. This was particularly interesting to me because we know that this cognitive control capacity is reduced in individuals who suffer from mental health problems.

就在我开始攻读博士学位的前几年,斯坦福大学(Stanford)的詹姆斯•格罗斯(James Gross)和纽约大学(NYU)的凯文•奥克斯纳(Kevin Ochsner)提出了他们颇具影响力的关于情绪调节的神经科学解释。他们的模型指出,成功的情绪调节依赖于认知控制。认知控制指的是我们关注与目标相关信息的能力,而忽略分散注意力的信息。他们提出这一观点的原因是,从大脑成像研究中积累的证据表明,在认知控制过程中被激活的大脑区域与涉及情绪调节的大脑区域重叠。这对我来说特别有趣,因为我们知道,这种认知控制能力在患有心理健康问题的人身上会减弱。

The question “How does our cognitive control capacity interact with our affective experiences?” became the focus of my work. Professor Dalgleish and I showed that when people’s ability to exert cognitive control in emotional contexts improved by training with basic computerized tasks, their ability to regulate their emotions also improved. Not only did participants report becoming better able to downregulate their distress to aversive films after our training but there were also changes in their brains. Specifically, the improved emotion regulation ability following the training was associated with changes in activation of a region of the brain called the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Previous work had shown that this region is critical to deploying cognitive control in affective contexts. Our initial work was carried out with healthy individuals but since then we have taken the training to clinical populations including posttraumatic stress disorder and showed similar benefits in emotion regulation. Based on this work I became interested in whether we could prevent emotion regulation difficulties from appearing in the first place, but to do this I needed to understand how emotion regulation develops.


How does emotion regulation develop across the lifespan?


There is robust evidence that emotion regulation rapidly improves during early childhood. Less is known, however, about the development of emotion regulation in adolescence and beyond. To explore this, I joined world-renown developmental cognitive neuroscientist Professor Sarah-Jayne Blakemore and her research group who study adolescent development at University College London’s Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience. Together we have been looking at age-related differences in the cognitive building blocks that underlie successful emotion regulation. That is, we study how adolescents and adults differ in their ability to exert cognitive control in emotional compared to neutral contexts. To study this we ask individuals to do cognitively demanding tasks, such as remembering numbers that are presented one after another in working memory. To manipulate emotional context we present these numbers over neutral or emotional background images. We found that the impact of emotional information on performance is associated with adolescents’ mental health, particularly in early adolescence (11-14 years). This means, the more difficulty adolescents have performing working memory tasks in emotional relative to neutral contexts, the more mental health difficulties they experience at an early age.


However, these cross-sectional studies don’t tell us anything about development of emotion regulation ability across time. For example, we don’t know whether these underlying abilities remain stable within an individual or improve with age. Or whether they fluctuate from day to day or even moment to moment? To study this we have developed a citizen science app – the Emotional Brain Study app.


How do you study emotion regulation with a citizen science app and what is citizen science?


The idea behind citizen science is that science and science policy are made open and accessible to the public. Citizen science ensures that science remains responsive to society’s concerns and needs, and acknowledges that anyone in society can themselves produce reliable scientific knowledge. In the case of our app, we ask the general public to help us study emotion regulation development and its association with mood across the lifespan. By providing us with very basic information about themselves and playing games on the app, individuals who use the app become ‘citizen scientists’. Within the app they first record their current mood as well as what they are doing that moment in time, and they then play any one of five games. These games tap into the cognitive functions that underlie successful emotion regulation. Specifically, they test memory, attention and other complex cognitive functions in the context of emotional and neutral information. The scientific data this citizen science project creates will allow us to start modelling how the cognitive control of emotions develops across the lifespan and how it might fluctuate within individuals. This is invaluable information that will improve our understanding of the basic cognitive functions underlying successful emotion regulation and, by extension, good mental health.


What can app-based research tell us that lab-based research can’t?


From our lab-based work we know that individuals who suffer from or who are at-risk for mental health problems find playing these games harder in emotional compared to neutral contexts. However, we know very little about how these functions relate to every day mood and moment-to-moment mood fluctuations. Gathering larger scale data on the association between performance on these games and mood using our app will allow us to explore these relationships and detect potential avenues for intervention. That means we will be able to optimize our training protocols to improve emotion regulation, hopefully before people even start experiencing mental health problems related to poor emotion regulation.


How will this research help those who struggle with emotion regulation or even mental health problems?


Imagine a scenario where regular digital mental health and cognition check-ups become common place. Symptoms can be recorded on apps and the types of game included in our app can be played to measure changes in cognitive functioning. Changes can indicate cognitive improvement or decline. Adding an affective dimension to the games, we may find that they can also help us discover when our abilities to regulate our emotions may be optimal or on the contrary start to become impaired. We can start tracking what improves/reduces our emotion regulation capacity. However, for these games to realize their prognostic potential we need to ensure they are reliable markers of emotion regulation and data from our Emotional Brain Study app will help us do exactly that. The more people use our app regularly, the more data we will have and the finer-grained the data modelling and validation we will be able to do when exploring the association between cognition, emotion regulation and mood across the lifespan. These are new frontiers for mental health researchers who study mental health from a developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective. Results from these new avenues of research will hopefully bring much needed improvements to our existing means of preventing and treating mental health problems.


For more, see:





The views expressed are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.




Scott Barry Kaufman


Scott Barry Kaufman is a psychologist at Columbia University exploring intelligence, creativity, personality, and well-being. In addition to writing the column Beautiful Minds for Scientific American, he also hosts The Psychology Podcast, and is author and/or editor of 8 books, including Wired to Create: Unravelling the Mysteries of the Creative Mind(with Carolyn Gregoire) and Ungifted: Intelligence Redefined. Find out more at http://ScottBarryKaufman.com.

斯科特·巴里·考夫曼(Scott Barry Kaufman)是哥伦比亚大学的心理学家,研究智力、创造力、个性和幸福感。除了为《科学美国人》(Scientific American)撰写专栏《美丽心灵》(Beautiful Minds)外,他还主持《心理学》(Psychology)播客,是担任8本书的作者和/编辑,其中包括《连线创造:揭开创造性思维的奥秘》(Wired to Create: elling the Mysteries of the Creative Mind)(与卡洛琳·格雷瓜尔(Carolyn Gregoire)合著)和《天才:重新定义的智力》(un: Intelligence Redefined)。更多信息请访问http://ScottBarryKaufman.com。

0 条评论